Showing posts with label enforcement. Show all posts
Showing posts with label enforcement. Show all posts

Monday, May 3, 2010

Mexican Invaders Threaten All Of America



The problem of illegal immigration is going to persist for many years to come. Arizona recently passed a law that few liberal minded people really understand. What I have done to help highlight the tragic invasion of illegal immigrants into America is post the above photo whereby the person holding it is alleging to "kill more police officers unless they get a job, a free house, free food, and no taxes."

The image was posted at Alex Jones's infowars.com whereby articles there state that America has been infiltrated with an estimated 50 Million illegal immigrants many of its most violent are responsible for 17,000 drug related murders last year alone on the U.S. border.

The U.S. Border is officially the most violent border on earth surpassing every gulf war in the last decade. Our Washington leaders refuse to help or support law enforcement officers like Sheriff Arpao who for years was threatened and harassed for doing his job of fighting illegals. Recently Lou Dobbs a media reporter and critic of illegal immigration resigned from the news when he and his family's home was shot at.

Connecticut, mainly lower fairfield county is a "magnet state" for illegal immigrants. Most come to America to usurp our laws, and prey on the very benefits created to care for legal U.S. citizens. What they found here was a liberal Democrat welcome wagon intent on assimilating them into a large Democratic voting block to defeat Republicans.

While this cruel game has been ongoing for a decade, America has been destabilized and overwhelmed with taxes to fund the strain placed as a result of the free entitlements that have to be paid out to this invading population.

These people come from a country, whereby you would be extorted arrested and imprisoned for crossing into their country's border illegally. These are also the same people who reduced Mexico into a Third World "hell hole" and now the same is beginning to happen in "America." Kudos to Arizona's Governor and her new illegal immigration law and the 70+ percent of the states population who demanded the bill.

Thursday, September 24, 2009

Tall Grass And Unregistered Cars Target Of Blight Ordinance

The city is stepping up efforts to combat blighted properties.

The Board of Aldermen recently adopted an antiblight ordinance that allows the city to slap the owner of a neglected property with a $100-a-day fine if the blighted property adversely affects the health, safety or property values of other residents.

The ordinance also allows the city to fix — at the property owner’s expense — long-ignored problems on properties deemed to be blighted.

Blight, as defined by the ordinance, can be as simple as broken windows or overgrown grass. An abandoned building, one with extensive fire or water damage or one that is infested with vermin or has unregistered cars or garbage on the property, also can be considered blighted.

Any other condition causing “substantial depreciation of the property values in the neighborhood” also falls under the ordinance.

Alderwoman Jessica Blacketter, D-4, asked City Attorney Win Smith during an ordinance committee meeting last week if the term “substantial depreciation” could be more clearly defined.

Smith advised against putting a percentage or dollar amount to represent lowered property values because property appraisals can vary a great deal, depending on who is doing the appraising.

A hard number or percentage of depreciation could undermine the city’s position in court and make the ordinance more difficult to enforce, Smith said.

Aldermanic Minority Leader Vincent Ditchkus, R-3, agreed with Smith.

“In the real estate market, you could have three different appraisers come out ... and have three different, substantial changes to that appraisal,” Ditchkus said.

Alderman Nick Veccharelli Jr., D-2, said he supported the idea of an anti-blight ordinance, but took issue with the one adopted because he thought it gave the “blight enforcement officer” too much power.

The idea of a blight enforcement officer being able to go onto a property based simply on an anonymous call, without first notifying the property owner, did not sit well with Veccharelli.

“I am simply asking that before we allow someone to enter onto somebody’s property — that we let them know we are coming over,” Veccharelli said. “Please, if they are going to go on someone’s property, let’s at least have the common decency to inform the people.”

Aldermanic Chairman Ben Blake, D-5, said the intent of the ordinance is to protect the health, safety and welfare of residents, and having to give notice “could take some of the bite out of the ordinance.”

Responsibility for enforcing the ordinance rests with the city health director or a designee.

Smith said the health director and zoning enforcement officer already have the power by state law to enter properties to deal with code violations.

ORIGINAL STORY BY JIM TINLEY

Monday, June 29, 2009

"Czar's" in Milford Are a Communist Concept

This is no joke, I picked up the Connecticut post today and there it was talk of a "Blight Czar." The first thing I thought of was the record number "Czars" that are now embedded into the Obama administration.

Just so we are clear here the word Czar means a Communist Russian "Emperor or King." Americas longest serving Democratic Congressman Rep. Byrd wrote a letter to Pres. Obama concerned that the record 18 czars in his administration represent a hazard that "can threaten the Constitutional system of checks and balances."

We do not need to start that outrageous practice here in Milford. The thought of letting future Mayors appoint PAID Czars outside the confirmation of the board of alderman, or without the consent of the governed, are far outside the principles of our Democratic Republic. Personally I heard these blight complaints about a year ago when I was out and about campaigning in the 118th district, some are reasonable and valid, others are mean spirited and an act of revenge against a neighbor. I also met people who were concerned with blighted commercial properties and wanted something done to improve them. I suppose with much heavy industry and commercial property in trouble, some ideas are ready to be put on the table.

What remains unclear to me is what exactly constitutes a "blighted property." If the definition extends to people who forgo home repairs in lieu of having a place to live, or a widow whose husband is no longer living to make home repairs, than no thanks on pursuing this idea.

However, if this idea is directed at abandoned properties and properties that pose a danger (such as a fire, structural, or intrusion hazard) that can harm others, than I agree. Certainly our town has a zoning and planning board, zoning enforcement board, and an office of Community and Economic Development. Milford also has a the additional Devon Revitalization Committee and as well as several other venues not mentioned to improve the look of our community.

The thought of appointing a Plight "Emperor or King" is funny and yet repulsive. Perhaps Milford's elected officials should focus on applying local laws without the imposition of tyrannical Communist Style "Czars." If you are wondering what a Communist "Czar" looks like see the above photo. (Save the bulldozer)